Non-Arbitrability Based Upon Unsigned Agreement Proves To Be A Two-Edged Sword

In Smart v. West Creek Financial, Inc., a Georgia federal court denied a finance company’s motion to compel arbitration, accepting the plaintiff’s disavowal that he ever signed the rent-to-own agreement containing the arbitration provision that the finance company sought to enforce. Victory was ephemeral, however, as the court proceeded to dismiss multiple statutory claims brought by plaintiff predicated on alleged unlawful conduct by the defendant associated with the unsigned rent-to-own agreement. Only one count–for unjust enrichment, based upon the defendant’s alleged removal of $110.45 from the plaintiff’s account–survived.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s