“Eleventh Circuit Holds University Cannot Arbitrate Student’s Breach of Contract and Misrepresentation Claims”

Christina Gallo of Carlton Fields has authored this article in JD Supra, discussing the court’s determination in Young v. Grand Canyon University, Inc. that the District Court “was wrong to compel arbitration of a student’s breach of contract and misrepresentation claims against a university, as federal regulation 34 C.F.R. § 685.300(e)-(f) prohibits a college or university that accepts federal student loan money from enforcing pre-dispute arbitration agreements when a student brings a ‘borrower defense claim.'” As Ms. Gallo noted, the Eleventh Circuit held that  “the regulation’s definition of ‘borrower defense claim’ includes breach of contract and substantial misrepresentation claims and therefore shields those claims from arbitration. “

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s