“Arbitration vs. Litigation: More Than Just a Preference for RWI Policyholders”

A New York court’s recent decision in WPP Group USA, Inc. v. RB/TDM Investors, LLC et al provides a point of reference for this JD Supra article by Ann Terrell Dorsett, Stephen Foresta, Aaron Jaroff and Lee Royster of McGuire Woods, in which they discuss the importance to purchasers of representations and warranties insurance policy of considering the pros and cons of insurance in negotiating the terms of the policy. In this particular matter, the policy provided the insured with the option of proceeding in court or arbitration, thereby enabling the policyholder to make the determination at the time the claim arose rather than committing to a particular path when the policy was put into effect.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s