Divided Court Requires Arbitration

By a 2-1 vote, a Washington Court of Appeals determined that an Authorized Representative of Sprint must arbitrate claims even though the representative commenced litigation only after Sprint declined requests to mediate in accordance with the parties’ agreement. In Pagecom, Inc. v. Sprint Solutions, Inc., the majority held that the occurrence of a mediation after the litigation was commenced was sufficient to trigger the obligation to arbitrate.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s