Court Rules Against Mid-Arbitration Judicial Review

In Burgess v. Lithia Motors, Inc., the Supreme Court of Washington held that a court cannot judicially review an arbitrator’s decision during the pendency of the arbitration, but must await the conclusion of the matter.

According to the court, “[o]nce arbitration begins under the FAA, the court’s authority to resolve the dispute is transferred to the arbitrator. Judicial intervention is generally precluded during arbitration proceedings. The language, framework, and underlying intent behind the FAA confirm that generally courts are limited to ruling on gateway
disputes, such as whether the arbitration clause is enforceable, and addressing the
award at the conclusion of arbitration.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s