Appeals Court Upholds Arbitration Requirement In Attorney’s Engagement Letter

The Michigan Court of Appeals, in Tinsley v. Yatooma, has affirmed a law firm’s right to have a malpractice claim against it addressed in arbitration. Holding that nothing in Michigan’s attorney ethics rules prohibited arbitration of such matters, the court found the agreement to have been knowingly and voluntarily entered by the client.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s