Federal Court Determines Claims Arising Following Cancellation Of Consumer Agreement Are Not Arbitrable

The United States District Court for the District of Tennessee has denied a lawn care provider’s motion to strike class allegations, rejecting the company’s contention that a dispute with a consumer required arbitration. According to the court, allegations that telemarketing calls to plaintiff after she cancelled her service did not arise before expiration of the agreement, and thus were not arbitrable.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s